Broker guide
What is Positive Gearing? Loan Assessment Guide
Positive gearing means property income exceeds its costs for the stated period. See how a broker verifies cash flow and separates it from lender servicing.
- Published
- Updated
Positive gearing means a property’s income exceeds its included costs over a stated period. For a loan file, the useful question is how the client calculated that surplus and which records support it. A positive property cash flow doesn’t automatically establish how much the lender will let the client borrow.
Define Positive Gearing
A positively geared property earns more rental income than its interest and other included property expenses for the period being measured. Treasury’s explanation of gearing uses income exceeding expenses as the definition. Negative gearing describes the reverse: expenses, including interest, exceed income.
Keep the gearing calculation separate from cash left after loan repayments. A principal-and-interest repayment includes an amount that reduces the loan balance. Including that principal payment in a cash budget can produce a smaller surplus than an interest-and-expenses comparison.
Before using a client’s positive-gearing claim, record the period and the costs included. State whether the figures include principal repayments, vacancy allowances and irregular expenses. Identify any excluded land tax, special strata levies or other known costs.
A month with rent received and few bills paid can look positive while the full year shows a shortfall. Rent advertised for an empty property is also different from rent already received. Keep those assumptions visible in the calculation.
Work Through a Property Cash Flow
Calculate property cash flow by subtracting the period’s property payments from rent received or reasonably budgeted for that same period. The following example is hypothetical. Every amount is in Australian dollars and covers one 52-week year, before the owner’s income tax.
Assume one owner, a residential unit rented at $700 a week and two weeks without rent. The hypothetical loan requires $24,000 in annual principal-and-interest repayments, comprising $19,000 interest and $5,000 principal. These are example inputs, not a loan quote or a predicted return.
| Annual line item | Calculation or assumption | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Rent with full occupancy | $700 multiplied by 52 weeks | $36,400 |
| Vacancy allowance | Two weeks multiplied by $700 | -$1,400 |
| Rent after vacancy | $36,400 less $1,400 | $35,000 |
| Council and water rates | Hypothetical annual bills | -$2,400 |
| Strata levies | Hypothetical annual levies | -$2,000 |
| Insurance | Hypothetical annual premiums | -$1,200 |
| Property management | 7% of $35,000 collected rent | -$2,450 |
| Maintenance allowance | Hypothetical annual budget | -$1,500 |
| Cash before loan repayments | $35,000 less $9,550 property costs | $25,450 |
| Loan repayments | Interest of $19,000 plus principal of $5,000 | -$24,000 |
| Annual cash surplus | $25,450 less $24,000 | $1,450 |
On the interest-and-property-cost basis, income exceeds the included costs by $6,450. After the $5,000 principal payment, the cash surplus is $1,450. Neither figure determines the client’s tax result.
This example excludes purchase and selling costs, depreciation and the owner’s income tax. It assumes no land tax or special strata levy is payable. Add any applicable cash cost before describing a real client’s surplus.
The small surplus changes when the inputs change. Four vacant weeks instead of two reduce rent by another $1,400. With management still charged at 7% of rent collected, the surplus falls to $148.
An extra $2,000 repair takes the original $1,450 surplus to a $550 shortfall. If annual loan repayments rise by $2,400, that original surplus becomes a $950 shortfall. Higher rates, strata levies or insurance premiums also reduce it dollar for dollar when other inputs stay fixed.
Moneysmart’s property-cost guide identifies these ongoing costs and explains the risk of vacancies and higher repayments. Use actual bills where available and label estimates separately. An annual surplus also leaves timing gaps when a large bill falls due before the next rent payment.
Translate the Claim Into Loan Evidence
Support a positive-gearing claim with the underlying rent and expense records, then enter the lender’s required inputs separately. Serviceability is the lender’s assessment of the borrower’s ability to meet loan commitments. It can produce a different result from the property’s cash budget.
Match each input to the property and the same reporting period:
| Scenario input | Records to gather | What to reconcile |
|---|---|---|
| Rent received | Property manager statements and relevant bank credits | Gross rent, deductions, missed payments and rent actually received |
| Contracted or estimated rent | Current lease or rental appraisal | Weekly amount, lease dates and whether the property is tenanted |
| Ownership | Title or purchase records | The client’s share of the property and income |
| Ongoing property costs | Rates notices, strata statements, insurance documents and management agreement | Annual amounts, due dates and expenses already deducted from rent |
| Maintenance | Paid invoices and separately labelled allowances | Actual spending versus budget estimates |
| Loan payments | Loan statements and repayment details | Balance, repayment type, interest and principal amounts |
If the property manager’s statement shows rent after fees, reconcile it to gross rent before deducting management again. For a purchase, keep the rental appraisal separate from evidence of an existing tenant’s payments. These records explain the scenario without implying every lender accepts each document for verification.
Macquarie’s serviceability input guidance, as at October 2026, apportions rent by ownership and uses only part of verified rent for servicing. It also gives separate property-expense input requirements. This illustrates why entering the client’s net cash surplus as rental income gives the wrong starting point.
Use the selected lender’s current rent, expense and debt inputs for the actual assessment. Keep the original cash-flow calculation alongside it so differences remain explainable. The rental income evidence guide covers detailed lender treatment, while the investment property loan guide covers the wider borrower and security assessment.
Set the Advice Boundary
The broker verifies the finance inputs and prepares the loan assessment. A property surplus alone doesn’t answer whether the investment suits the client or what tax treatment applies.
Record the client’s stated purpose, the source of each amount and the cash-flow assumptions. Explain any differences between that budget and the lender’s serviceability result. The lender decides acceptable evidence, borrowing capacity and approval under its assessment.
Give the client the rent records, expense breakdown and loan interest details to take to their accountant or registered tax agent. Tax treatment requires that separate assessment. Questions about investment suitability and return forecasts belong with an appropriately qualified adviser.
Finish the finance file with a supported cash-flow calculation and a separate lender assessment. Describe exactly which costs the surplus includes, so the client and assessor can understand the same figures.